JBC American Radiolabeled Chemicals
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Abstract of this Article
Reprint (PDF) Version of this Article
Similar articles found in:
JBC Online
PubMed
PubMed Citation
This Article has been cited by:
other online articles
Search Medline for articles by:
Dekker, L. V. || Parker, P. J.
Alert me when:
new articles cite this article
Download to Citation Manager


Volume 272, Number 19, Issue of May 9, 1997 pp. 12747-12753
©1997 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

Regulated Binding of the Protein Kinase C Substrate GAP-43 to the V0/C2 Region of Protein Kinase C-delta *

(Received for publication, June 27, 1996, and in revised form, March 4, 1997)

Lodewijk V. Dekker Dagger and Peter J. Parker

From the Protein Phosphorylation Laboratory, Imperial Cancer Research Fund, 44 Lincoln's Inn Fields, London WC2A 3PX, United Kingdom

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
REFERENCES


ABSTRACT

The interaction between protein kinase C-delta and its neuronal substrate, GAP-43, was studied. Two forms of protein kinase C-delta were isolated from COS cells and characterized by differences in gel mobility, GAP-43 binding, and specific GAP-43 and histone kinase activities. A slow migrating, low specific activity form of protein kinase C-delta bound directly to immobilized GAP-43. Binding was abolished in the presence of EGTA, suggesting Ca2+ dependence of the interaction. The free catalytic domain of protein kinase C-delta did not bind GAP-43, suggesting the existence of a binding site in the regulatory domain. Glutathione S-transferase-protein kinase C-delta regulatory domain fusion proteins were generated and tested for binding to GAP-43. The V0/C2-like amino-terminal domain was defined as the GAP-43-binding site. GAP-43 binding to this region is inhibited by EGTA and regulated at Ca2+ levels between 10-7 and 10-6 M. The interaction between protein kinase C-delta and GAP-43 was studied in intact cells by coexpression of the two proteins in human embryonic kidney cells followed by immunoprecipitation. Complex formation occurred only after treatment of the cells with the Ca2+ ionophore ionomycin, indicating that elevation of intracellular Ca2+ is required for interaction in vivo. It is concluded that protein kinase C-delta interacts with GAP-43 through the V0/C2-like domain, outside the catalytic site, and that this interaction is modulated by intracellular Ca2+.


INTRODUCTION

The protein kinase C (PKC)1 family is a ubiquitous and abundant kinase family involved in the transduction of extracellular signals in a large number of different tissues (reviewed in Refs. 1-4). PKC isotypes are activated by Ca2+, phospholipids, and diacylglycerol (or its pharmacomimetic phorbol ester), which bind at conserved (C) regions in the regulatory domain. Three PKC subfamilies are distinguished on the basis of the variability in their regulatory domains and consequential differences in cofactor dependence. The regulatory domains of PKC-alpha , -beta , and -gamma contain a C1 and a C2 region, rendering them responsive to diacylglycerol/phorbol ester, which bind at C1, as well as to Ca2+, which binds at C2. The regulatory domains of PKC-delta , -epsilon , -eta , and -theta contain C1, but lack C2, resulting in Ca2+ independence. A variable extension (V0) is present N-terminal of the C1 region. PKC-zeta and -iota /lambda resemble the isotypes in the latter subfamily; however, their C1 region is different and will not bind phorbol ester or diacylglycerol (1-7).

Activation of PKC leads to phosphorylation of substrate proteins and ultimately to a biological response. The growth-associated protein GAP-43 (also known as neuromodulin, p57, B-50, F1, pp46, and gamma 5) is one of the better characterized cellular PKC substrates known (8, 9). It has an almost exclusively neuronal localization and is present at high levels during development or during neuronal regeneration processes (10, 11). In early stages of development, it is not confined to any particular part of the neuron; however, upon maturation, its expression becomes restricted to the axon, where it remains detectable in the axon shaft as well as in the axon terminal (12, 13). GAP-43 is a very acidic, "rod-shaped" protein with a predicted molecular mass of 23 kDa (9). It contains a single PKC phosphorylation site at Ser-41 and is further modified by dipalmitoylation at two adjacent Cys residues, Cys-2 and Cys-3 (9). This allows for membrane localization of the protein in the absence of an obvious hydrophobic domain. Phosphorylation of GAP-43 in vivo is significantly stimulated by phorbol ester and, in various systems, by membrane depolarization, nerve growth factor treatment, and conditions under which hippocampal slices show long-term potentiation (14-16). Manipulation of GAP-43 levels suggests a role for the protein in neurite outgrowth, possibly by modulating the adhesive properties of the growth cone (17, 18). Furthermore, a role for GAP-43 in transmitter release has been proposed based on observations that interference with GAP-43 affects the release of neurotransmitter (19-23) and that overexpression of GAP-43 changes the competence of pituitary cells to release hormone (24). Some of the biochemical properties of GAP-43, such as its capacity to bind calmodulin and actin or to affect GTP-binding proteins, may underlie its cellular functions (8). It has been shown that GAP-43 serves as a substrate for a number of PKC isotypes (25, 26) and that PKC-mediated phosphorylation of GAP-43 directly modulates its calmodulin binding capacity (8, 9).

It has been postulated that in addition to being effector molecules, PKC substrates also bind to the kinase directly, a property that may be important for intracellular targeting of PKC. Little is known concerning the manner in which PKC interacts with GAP-43, although the existence of a high affinity binding site outside the phosphoacceptor region has been proposed on the basis of enzyme kinetic studies (26). In this study, we have addressed this issue by investigating the molecular determinants in PKC involved in GAP-43 binding. We demonstrate that GAP-43 interacts directly with PKC-delta outside the catalytic domain at the V0/C2 region. This defines a protein interaction domain on PKC-delta and suggests new ways to evaluate the functional relevance of the PKC/GAP-43 system.


EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

Materials

A monoclonal antibody to GAP-43 was obtained from Affinity Laboratories. The PKC-delta rabbit polyclonal antiserum was raised against a C-terminal 10-mer peptide (27). An affinity-purified polyclonal antibody to glutathione S-transferase (GST) was obtained from Pat Warne and Julian Downward (Imperial Cancer Research Fund, London). The calmodulin polyclonal antibody, produced by Dr. A. Means, was obtained from Dr. E. Wood (Department of Biochemistry, University of Leeds). COS-7 cells and human embryonic kidney 293 cells were obtained from the Cell Production Unit at the Imperial Cancer Research Fund (London).

Expression of PKC-delta in COS Cells and Column Chromatography

The PKC-delta expression plasmid pKS1-PKC-delta (27) was introduced into COS-7 cells by electroporation, and three 15-cm dishes of transfected COS cells were grown. Three days post-transfection, COS cells were washed three times in ice-cold buffer A (137 mM NaCl, 3 mM KCl, 10 mM Na2HPO4, 2 mM KH2PO4, pH 7.2) and scraped in harvesting buffer (20 mM Tris-Cl, pH 7.5, 10 mM EGTA, 5 mM EDTA, 0.3% (v/v) beta -mercaptoethanol, 250 µg/ml leupeptin, 10 mM benzamidine, 50 µg/ml phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 1% (v/v) Triton X-100). The resulting cell suspension was homogenized in a Dounce homogenizer by 20 strokes, incubated for 15 min at 4 °C, diluted to 10 ml in buffer B (20 mM Tris-Cl, pH 7.5, 2 mM EDTA, 10 mM benzamidine, 0.3% (v/v) beta -mercaptoethanol, 0.02% (v/v) Triton X-100), and centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 30 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was loaded onto a MonoQ column (Pharmacia Biotech Inc.) equilibrated with buffer B. Fractions (0.5 ml) were collected at a flow rate of 0.2 ml/min with a 25-min isocratic wash followed by a gradient of NaCl in buffer B (0-0.5 M in 120 min). After collection, an equal volume of glycerol was added to each fraction, and fractions were stored at -20 °C.

Generation of Recombinant Histidine-tagged GAP-43 (hisGAP-43)

DNA representing the human GAP-43 coding domain (28) was generated by polymerase chain reaction using a human fetal brain library as template. The DNA was cloned in BamHI-XhoI sites of pRSETb (Invitrogen) using restriction sites engineered in the primers, and the resulting construct was used to transform XL-1 Blue bacteria. For protein production, 400 ml of LB medium was inoculated (1:20) with an overnight culture of XL-1/pRSETb-GAP-43 cells and grown for 3 h at 37 °C. Isopropyl-beta -D-thiogalactopyranoside was then added to a final concentration of 1 mM, and after a further incubation of 5 h at 37 °C, cells were harvested and resuspended in 20 ml of ice-cold buffer C (50 mM sodium phosphate, pH 8.0, M NaCl, 3 mM beta -mercaptoethanol, 30 mM imidazole, 10 mM benzamidine, 0.1% (v/v) Triton X-100) containing 50 µg/ml leupeptin and 200 µg/ml aprotinin. The cell suspension was sonicated for 1 min on ice using a Soniprep 2000, cooled for 1 min, and sonicated twice more for 2 min separated by 1 min of cooling. The resulting extract was centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 30 min at 4 °C, and the supernatant was taken and tumbled with Ni2+-NTA-agarose beads (QIAGEN Inc.; 0.5-ml bed volume, washed in buffer A) for 1 h at 4 °C. The beads were spun down and washed three times with 50 ml of buffer C and three times with 50 ml of buffer D (50 mM sodium phosphate, pH 6.0, 1 M NaCl, 3 mM beta -mercaptoethanol, 30 mM imidazole, 10 mM benzamidine, 0.1% (v/v) Triton X-100, 10% (v/v) glycerol) at 4 °C. Finally, hisGAP-43 was eluted by tumbling the beads twice for 1 h at 4 °C in 1 ml of buffer D + 350 mM imidazole. The resulting preparation was dialyzed overnight against MilliQ H2O at 4 °C.

Generation of GST-PKC-delta Regulatory Domain Fusion Proteins

A BanI (filled in)-HindIII cDNA fragment representing the regulatory domain of PKC-delta was inserted in EcoRI (filled in)-HindIII-digested pGEX-KG (Pharmacia) to generate pGEX-KG-PKC-delta -(1-298). A BamHI-HindIII fragment was taken out of this construct and inserted into pKSII(+) (Stratagene). The resulting plasmid was digested with HindIII and ApaI and treated with exonuclease III, resulting in random deletion of the plasmid from the HindIII site. The digested mixture was blunt-ended with mung bean nuclease, religated, and used to transform XL-1 Blue bacteria. Plasmids with inserts of different lengths were selected and verified by sequence analysis. The inserts were taken out and reinserted into pGEX-KG. For the construction of pGEX-KG-PKC-delta -(1-121), a BamHI-BstNI fragment was taken out of pKSII(+)-PKC-delta -(1-298) and inserted into pGEX-KG.

For protein production, 400 ml of LB medium was inoculated (1:20) with an overnight culture of XL-1 Blue cells transformed with the appropriate pGEX-KG-PKC-delta regulatory domain construct and grown for 3 h at 37 °C. Isopropyl-beta -D-thiogalactopyranoside was then added to a final concentration of 0.1 mM, and after further incubation for 3-5 h at 37 °C, cells were harvested and resuspended in 20 ml of ice-cold buffer A. The cell suspension was sonicated three times for 1 min on ice using a Soniprep 2000 each time, interrupted by 1 min of cooling on ice. The resulting cell extract was centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 20 min at 4 °C, and to the supernatant was added Triton X-100 (final concentration of 1% (v/v)). The supernatant was tumbled with glutathione-Sepharose 4B (Pharmacia; 0.25-ml bed volume, washed in buffer A) for 1 h at 4 °C, after which the beads were spun down and washed twice with 50 ml of ice-cold buffer A. The GST fusion proteins were eluted from the beads in 0.5 ml of buffer E (50 mM Tris-Cl, pH 8.0, 5 mM reduced glutathione).

Binding Assay

Routinely, hisGAP-43 and GST fusion proteins were mixed and incubated in 50 µl of buffer E for 1 h at 4 °C. Then, a 20-µl bed volume of Ni2+-NTA-agarose beads in 150 µl of buffer E was added, and incubation was continued for 1 h. Subsequently, the beads were spun down, drained completely, and washed twice with 1 ml of buffer E. Proteins bound to Ni2+-NTA-agarose were eluted by shaking the beads in 30 µl of buffer E + 350 mM imidazole at 1300 rpm for 30 min at 25 °C. Beads were spun down, and the supernatant was taken. Adjustments to the incubation conditions are described below and in the figure legends and were made both before and after the addition of the beads.

Coexpression in 293 Cells and Immunoprecipitation

A GAP-43 expression construct was generated by inserting the GAP-43 coding sequence into pcDNA3. Human embryonic kidney 293 cells were cotransfected with pcDNA3-GAP-43 and pKS1 or pKS1-PKC-delta (27) by the calcium phosphate precipitation method (29). After 3 days, the cells were treated for 15 min with 1.3 µM ionomycin. Subsequently, the cells were homogenized in buffer A containing 1% Triton X-100, 100 µg/ml leupeptin, 100 µg/ml aprotinin, and 10 mM benzamidine and centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 20 min at 4 °C. To the supernatants were added 50 µl of PKC-delta antiserum PP084 and 100 µl of protein A-agarose (50% bead volume in buffer A). The mixture was incubated for 16 h at 4 °C, after which the protein A beads were collected by centrifugation and washed three times with buffer A. PKC-delta was eluted from the protein A-antibody complex by incubation for 1 h with 20 µg of peptide antigen (27) in 65 µl of buffer A. The eluate was analyzed by SDS-PAGE and Western blotting.

Other Methods

PKC enzyme activity was measured as described (30) with modifications as indicated in the figure legends. GAP-43 phosphorylation was quantified by analyzing the phosphorylation mixture by SDS-PAGE and Cerenkov counting of the 32P incorporation in the GAP-43 protein band. Western analysis of proteins separated by SDS-PAGE was performed according to Towbin et al. (31). Nitrocellulose filters were incubated with antiserum (specified in the figure legends) in buffer A containing 1% fat-free skimmed milk and 0.05% Tween 20. Filters were processed using the ECL detection reagent (Amersham International, Buckinghamshire, United Kingdom). Silver staining of proteins separated by SDS-PAGE was performed according to Merril et al. (32).


RESULTS

Phosphorylation of GAP-43 by PKC-delta

It has been reported that GAP-43 is phosphorylated by a number of PKC isotypes (25, 26). The phosphorylation reaction may involve a complex interaction between GAP-43 and PKC since the kinetics of phosphorylation of GAP-43 polypeptide and phosphorylation site oligopeptide differ (26). We noticed differences among PKC-delta preparations in their activity toward GAP-43, but not peptide substrates, also indicating complexity of interaction (data not shown). To investigate this in more detail, PKC-delta was overexpressed in COS cells and partially purified by MonoQ ion-exchange chromatography. MonoQ fractions were analyzed for kinase activity using exogenous recombinant hisGAP-43 or histone III-S as substrate. GAP-43 kinase activity eluted in three main peaks (peaks 1-3), two of which were dependent on cofactor, with the third being largely cofactor-independent (Fig. 1A). Histone kinase activity in these fractions showed an additional cofactor-dependent activity (peak 4) eluting before peak 3 (Fig. 1B).


Fig. 1. MonoQ chromatography of PKC-delta extracted from COS cells. COS cells were transfected with a PKC-delta expression construct and, after 3 days, extracted in 1% Triton X-100 buffer. The extract was cleared, and the supernatant was subjected to MonoQ chromatography as described under "Experimental Procedures." A, 5 µl of each fraction was analyzed for GAP-43 kinase activity in the presence of 1 mM CaCl2 and 1 mM MgCl2 and in either the presence (bullet ) or absence (open circle ) of phosphatidylserine and phorbol ester as described (30). Phosphorylated proteins were separated by 12.5% SDS-PAGE, and the phosphate incorporation in GAP-43 was measured by Cerenkov counting of the GAP-43 protein band. Peaks 1-3 are indicated. B, 5 µl of each fraction was assayed for histone kinase activity in the presence of 0.5 mM CaCl2 and 2 mM MgCl2 in the presence or absence of phosphatidylserine and phorbol ester as described for A. Peaks 1-4 are indicated. C, 1 µl of each fraction was separated by 8% SDS-PAGE. The proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose, and the filters were incubated for 16 h at 4 °C in PKC-delta antiserum PP084 diluted 1:10,000 in buffer A supplemented with 1% fat-free milk powder and 0.05% Tween 20. The open arrowheads indicate the two forms of full-length PKC-delta . The positions of molecular mass markers (in kDa) are given on the right. PKC-delta -cat, catalytic fragment of PKC-delta . D, short exposure of the autoradiograph shown in C.
[View Larger Version of this Image (39K GIF file)]

Fig. 1C shows a Western blot of the individual fractions probed with an antibody recognizing the PKC-delta C terminus. Full-length forms of PKC-delta coeluted with peaks 1 and 2, whereas a PKC-delta breakdown product of ~45 kDa (representing the catalytic domain) eluted in peak 3. Peak 1 contained a fast migrating form of PKC-delta , and peak 2 contained a slower migrating form; fraction 25, between these peaks, contained both. Neither of the forms reacted with an antibody recognizing phosphotyrosine. Western blotting also revealed that peak 4 represents endogenous PKC-alpha present in COS cells (data not shown).

To visualize all PKC-delta immunoreactivity in the different fractions, an overexposed autoradiograph is shown in Fig. 1C. Densitometric scanning of an exposure in the linear range (Fig. 1D) revealed the amount of PKC-delta in peak 1 to be 10-20% of that in peak 2. By dividing the GAP-43 kinase activity of these fractions by the amount of antigen, an indication (albeit a semiquantitative one) of the specific GAP-43 kinase activity in these PKC-delta peaks was obtained. The specific GAP-43 kinase activity of peak 1 PKC-delta (fraction 23) was estimated to be 7-fold that of peak 2 PKC-delta (fraction 26). Specific GAP-43 kinase activity in fractions 30-33 did not differ from that in fractions 26-29. This analysis also revealed that the PKC-delta catalytic domain (peak 3) had much higher specific GAP-43 kinase activity than either peak 1 or 2.

Ca2+-dependent Binding of GAP-43 to PKC-delta

To assess the potential interaction of PKC-delta with GAP-43, the individual MonoQ fractions were incubated with hisGAP-43, after which hisGAP-43 was immobilized on Ni2+-NTA-agarose beads, washed, and eluted from the beads by imidazole. The eluate was analyzed by SDS-PAGE followed by Western blotting for PKC-delta and hisGAP-43. Fig. 2A shows that peak 2 PKC-delta bound to immobilized GAP-43, whereas no GAP-43 binding was detected for peak 1. PKC-delta did not bind directly to the Ni2+-NTA-agarose beads (Fig. 2B). Furthermore, no binding of the PKC-delta catalytic domain (peak 3) to GAP-43 occurred (Fig. 2C).


Fig. 2. Differential interaction of PKC-delta forms with GAP-43. A, 100 µl of MonoQ fractions 20-33 (see Fig. 1) was analyzed for binding to hisGAP-43 in 250 µl of buffer E as described under "Experimental Procedures." Eluted proteins were separated by 12.5% SDS-PAGE and Western-blotted using PKC-delta antiserum PP084 and an antibody to GAP-43. B, PKC-delta (peak 2, fraction 27) was immobilized on Ni2+-NTA-agarose beads in the presence (+) or absence (-) of hisGAP-43. Ten out of 250 µl of nonbound material was analyzed for the presence of PKC-delta and GAP-43 by sequential Western blotting. Bound material was eluted with imidazole and analyzed in a similar fashion. C, conditions were the same as described for B, except that the catalytic fragment of PKC-delta (PKC-delta -cat; fraction 38) was analyzed for binding to hisGAP-43. The Western blot shown was sequentially incubated with PKC-delta and GAP-43 antibodies. The positions of molecular mass markers (in kDa) are indicated.
[View Larger Version of this Image (55K GIF file)]

PKC-delta is known for its Ca2+-independent catalytic activity. Indeed, both PKC-delta forms phosphorylated histone III-S in a Ca2+-independent manner, whereas PKC-alpha (peak 3) showed Ca2+ dependence under the same conditions (Fig. 3A). Surprisingly, GAP-43 binding to PKC-delta (peak 2) was found to be reduced in the presence of EGTA, suggesting Ca2+ dependence of this interaction (Fig. 3B). In contrast to the Ca2+-independent phosphorylation of histone by peak 2 PKC-delta , phosphorylation of GAP-43 increased upon EGTA addition (Fig. 3C). This was not the case for peak 1 PKC-delta , which showed Ca2+-independent phosphorylation of histone as well as GAP-43 (Fig. 3, A and C).


Fig. 3. Ca2+ dependence of GAP-43 binding to PKC-delta and GAP-43 phosphorylation by PKC-delta . A, histone kinase activity of PKC-delta (peak 1, fraction 23; and peak 2, fraction 26) or PKC-alpha (fraction 36) determined in the presence of 1 mM CaCl2 (black bars); 1 mM CaCl2, phosphatidylserine, and 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate (white bars); or 1 mM EGTA, phosphatidylserine, and 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate (dotted bars). B, PKC-delta (peak 2, fraction 27) binding to hisGAP-43 in the presence of 1 mM CaCl2 or 1 mM EGTA. See Fig. 2B for details of sample analysis. The positions of molecular mass markers (in kDa) are indicated. C, GAP-43 phosphorylation by PKC-delta (peak 1, fraction 23; and peak 2, fraction 26) under the same conditions as described for A.
[View Larger Version of this Image (16K GIF file)]

These data indicate that GAP-43 and PKC-delta interact directly with each other in a Ca2+-dependent fashion at a site outside the catalytic domain. Furthermore, PKC-delta is functionally heterogeneous since only the later eluting, slow migrating form (peak 2) bound to GAP-43. (It should be noted that since GAP-43 is not expressed in COS cells, the lack of binding to peak 1 is not due to a pre-existing GAP-43·PKC-delta complex.)

Ca2+-dependent Binding of GAP-43 to the V0/C2 Domain of PKC-delta

In view of the fact that full-length PKC-delta bound to GAP-43, but the the catalytic domain of PKC-delta did not, we investigated where the interaction occurs in the regulatory domain. PKC-delta regulatory domain fragments of different length were produced as recombinant GST fusion proteins. Fig. 4 shows the relative yield of the various fragments after extraction of the proteins and purification using glutathione-Sepharose 4B. Of four regulatory domain fragments, GST-PKC-delta -(1-121) showed the highest levels of expression and the highest yield. PKC-delta -(1-121) represents the region of PKC-delta that previously has been identified as V0 (1, 2) and that shares structural homology with the C2 region of the classical PKC isotypes (33). GST-PKC-delta -(1-298) and GST-PKC-delta -(1-165) showed, in addition to proteins of the predicted size, a breakdown product of ~40 kDa. GST-PKC-delta -(1-121) and GST-PKC-delta -(1-61) were homogeneous proteins of the predicted molecular mass.


Fig. 4. Expression of GST-PKC-delta regulatory domain fusion protein in Escherichia coli XL-1 Blue cells. GST fusion proteins were prepared as described under "Experimental Procedures" in a scaled-down procedure using 10 ml of starting culture. The proteins were finally eluted in 200 µl of buffer E. Thirty µl of each eluate was analyzed by 10% SDS-PAGE, followed by Coomassie Brilliant Blue staining of the gel. The closed arrowheads indicate proteins that react with a glutathione S-transferase antibody as determined separately by Western blotting. The open arrowhead indicates the breakdown product in the GST-PKC-delta -(1-298) and GST-PKC-delta -(1-165) preparations. The positions of molecular mass markers (in kDa) are indicated on the left.
[View Larger Version of this Image (51K GIF file)]

To establish whether the regulatory domain of PKC-delta was able to bind GAP-43, the various GST-PKC-delta fusion proteins were assayed for binding to hisGAP-43 as described above. Fig. 5A shows that both GST-PKC-delta -(1-298) and GST-PKC-delta -(1-121) co-immobilized with hisGAP-43 on Ni2+-NTA beads. GST-PKC-delta -(1-61) and GST did not associate with hisGAP-43. In the absence of hisGAP-43, GST-PKC-delta -(1-298) and GST-PKC-delta -(1-121) were not present in the eluate, indicating that they do not bind directly to the beads. Fig. 5B shows the concentration dependence of the binding of GST-PKC-delta -(1-121) to hisGAP-43. At 0.5 µM GAP-43, half-maximum binding of GST-PKC-delta -(1-121) was estimated to occur at 50 nM.


Fig. 5. Binding of GST-PKC-delta regulatory domain fusion proteins to hisGAP-43. A, equal amounts of GST-PKC-delta regulatory domain fusion proteins were analyzed for binding to immobilized hisGAP-43 as described under "Experimental Procedures." Proteins were separated by 12.5% SDS-PAGE and visualized by silver staining. The left panel shows the total amount of each fusion protein subjected to the GAP-43 binding assay; the middle panel shows the imidazole eluate of assays performed in the presence of hisGAP-43; and the right panel shows that of assays in the absence of hisGAP-43. The arrows indicate the retained fusion proteins, and the arrowhead shows hisGAP-43. Lane MW shows the positions of molecular mass markers (in kDa). B, shown is the concentration dependence of GST-PKC-delta -(1-121) binding to hisGAP-43. Lanes 1-6 refer to 1:2 serial dilutions of the fusion protein subjected to the binding assay. For details, see A.
[View Larger Version of this Image (45K GIF file)]

The binding of GST-PKC-delta -(1-121) to hisGAP-43 was not affected by high concentrations of NaCl (Fig. 6A). Similarly, 2 mM CaCl2 did not change binding, but it was completely lost in the presence of 1 mM EGTA (Fig. 6A). The interaction between PKC-delta -(1-121) and hisGAP-43 may therefore be supported by trace calcium ions present in the incubation buffers. Analysis of the Ca2+ dependence of GAP-43 binding to PKC-delta -(1-121) in an EGTA-buffered system showed binding to occur at Ca2+ concentrations higher than 10-7 M (Fig. 6B). At a concentration of 10-7 M or lower, binding was dramatically reduced. The binding of hisGAP-43 to the Ni2+-NTA-agarose beads was not affected by these Ca2+ concentrations (data not shown).


Fig. 6. Binding of GST-PKC-delta -(1-121) to hisGAP-43 in the presence or absence of NaCl and CaCl2. A, binding of GST-PKC-delta -(1-121) to hisGAP-43 was determined as described for Fig. 3 under standard conditions or in the presence of 1 M NaCl, 1 mM CaCl2, or 1 mM EGTA. Proteins were separated by 12.5% SDS-PAGE and visualized by Coomassie Brilliant Blue staining (left panel) or silver staining (right panel). Lane MW shows the positions of molecular mass markers (in kDa). B, binding of GST-PKC-delta -(1-121) to hisGAP-43 was measured at increasing concentrations of free Ca2+ in the presence of 1 mM EGTA, pH 7.0. Proteins were separated by 12.5% SDS-PAGE and analyzed by Western blotting using an antibody against GST.
[View Larger Version of this Image (38K GIF file)]

Characterization of the PKC-delta -binding Region on GAP-43

To refine the binding of PKC-delta -(1-121) to GAP-43, we generated a C-terminal truncation mutant of GAP-43 (hisGAP-43-(1-146)) and analyzed its capacity to bind the various GST-PKC-delta regulatory domain constructs. In all aspects, hisGAP-43-(1-146) behaved in the same way as full-length hisGAP-43 both in terms of the binding preferences and concentration dependences of binding (Fig. 7). Thus, the binding of PKC-delta to GAP-43 occurs in the N-terminal part of the protein between residues 1 and 146. 


Fig. 7. Binding of GST-PKC-delta -(1-121) to hisGAP-43-(1-146). Conditions were as described for Fig. 5B, except that hisGAP-43-(1-146) instead of GAP-43 was used to assess binding. Lane MW shows the positions of molecular mass markers (in kDa).
[View Larger Version of this Image (39K GIF file)]

Since GAP-43 is a calmodulin-binding protein, we investigated whether the binding of GST-PKC-delta -(1-121) would preclude calmodulin binding to GAP-43. Calmodulin was identified on SDS gel by silver stain (Fig. 8B) based on its migration at the appropriate size (17 kDa) and by Western blotting using a calmodulin antibody (Fig. 8C). In line with existing literature, calmodulin bound to hisGAP-43 (immobilized on Ni2+-NTA-agarose beads) in the absence, but not in the presence, of CaCl2 (Fig. 8, B and C). GST-PKC-delta -(1-121) binding to hisGAP-43 occurred whether or not calmodulin was associated, and similarly, calmodulin binding was unaffected when increasing amounts of GST-PKC-delta -(1-121) were bound to hisGAP-43 (Fig. 8). hisGAP-43 association with the Ni2+-NTA-agarose beads was identical under all conditions (Fig. 8A). Thus, PKC-delta binding to hisGAP-43 occurs at a site that is different from the calmodulin-binding site.


Fig. 8. Binding of GST-PKC-delta -(1-121) to hisGAP-43 in the presence of calmodulin. GST-PKC-delta -(1-121), hisGAP-43, and calmodulin were mixed in buffer E and in buffer E containing 2 mM CaCl2 and incubated for 60 min at 4 °C. To the mixture was added Ni2+-NTA-agarose in buffer E or buffer E + 2 mM CaCl2; incubation was continued for 60 min at 4 °C; and complexes bound to the beads were then recovered by centrifugation. Complexes were eluted with imidazole, separated by 12.5% SDS-PAGE, and visualized by silver staining (A and B) or by Western blotting using a calmodulin antibody (C). Some background is visible in B due to the sensitivity of the silver staining (vertical lines). The concentration of GST-PKC-delta -(1-121) added to the incubations in C was identical to the highest concentration added to the incubations in B.
[View Larger Version of this Image (45K GIF file)]

Co-immunoprecipitation of GAP-43 and PKC-delta

To test whether GAP-43 and PKC-delta are able to form a productive complex in intact cells, co-immunoprecipitation assays were performed. A GAP-43 and a PKC-delta expression construct were transfected into 293 cells; PKC-delta was immunoprecipitated; and the immunoprecipitate was analyzed for the presence of GAP-43 by Western blotting. Since GAP-43 binds to PKC-delta in a Ca2+-dependent manner in vitro, transfected cells were treated with the Ca2+ ionophore ionomycin to elevate intracellular Ca2+ levels. Fig. 9 shows GAP-43 to be present in PKC-delta immunoprecipitates from 293 cells cotransfected with GAP-43 and PKC-delta and treated with ionomycin. In the absence of ionomycin treatment, very little GAP-43 was detected. As a control, immunoprecipitations were carried out on cell lysates from cells that were transfected with GAP-43, but not PKC-delta . In these immunoprecipitates, background levels of GAP-43 were detected comparable to the level detected in the immunoprecipitates from cells not treated with ionomycin. We conclude that GAP-43 and PKC-delta form a complex in cells in response to elevation of intracellular Ca2+ as predicted on the basis of the in vitro binding studies.


Fig. 9. Co-immunoprecipitation of GAP-43 and PKC-delta . Shown is a Western blot of GAP-43 present in PKC-delta immunoprecipitates (PKC-delta I.P.) from cells transfected with pcDNA3-GAP-43 and with either pKS1 or pKS1-PKC-delta . Where indicated, cells were treated with 1.3 µM ionomycin for 15 min. GAP-43 is present in cells expressing PKC-delta and treated with ionomycin. The lower panel shows the amount of GAP-43 in the supernatants after immunoprecipitation.
[View Larger Version of this Image (24K GIF file)]


DISCUSSION

Evidence has been presented for the formation of a GAP-43·PKC-delta complex in intact cells and for the direct binding of GAP-43 at the regulatory domain of PKC-delta . Within the regulatory domain, the V0 region presents a minimal binding site. Little is known about the structure and function of this region, which is present in novel as well as atypical PKC isotypes. Recently, it was proposed that it may share structural homology with the C2 region in PKC-alpha , -beta , and -gamma (33). Our observation that GAP-43 binding occurs at the V0/C2 region of PKC-delta indicates that it may serve as a protein-protein interaction domain. Furthermore, the Ca2+ dependence of the interaction shows that circumstances may exist in which "Ca2+-independent" PKCs, such as PKC-delta , may still respond to changes in Ca2+ levels.

The PKC-delta employed in this study was partially purified from COS cells and separated into two forms, characterized by differences in mobility on SDS gels. The slow migrating form of PKC-delta (peak 2) binds GAP-43, and binding of GAP-43 to this form was abolished by EGTA treatment, suggesting Ca2+ dependence of the interaction. No GAP-43 binding to the fast migrating form of PKC-delta (peak 1) was detected. The difference in migration of the two PKC-delta forms is likely to be a result of phosphorylation, as was previously shown for many other PKC isotypes (34, 35). Although tyrosine phosphorylation of PKC-delta is a well established phenomenon (36-38), we could find no evidence that one of the forms in this study is tyrosine-phosphorylated.

Under all circumstances, we observed a reciprocal correlation between the ability of PKC-delta to bind GAP-43 and its specific GAP-43 kinase activity. The high binding form shows low specific activity and vice versa. EGTA treatment of the binding form (abolishing GAP-43 binding) results in an increase in GAP-43 kinase activity. Under these conditions, histone kinase activity is not affected, indicating that EGTA impinges on a component in the reaction specifically related to GAP-43. Phosphorylation of GAP-43 by peak 1, the non-binding form, is not affected by EGTA, indicating that the effect of EGTA on GAP-43 phosphorylation is restricted to the binding form. The free catalytic domain of PKC-delta , which does not bind GAP-43, shows high activity. A unifying explanation for our observations is that GAP-43 binding may affect the specific GAP-43 kinase activity of PKC-delta , measured in the in vitro phosphorylation reaction. In addition to GAP-43 binding, other properties of PKC-delta play a role in the phosphorylation reaction. We observed that differences occur in histone kinase activity between the PKC-delta forms, although there is no complete quantitative agreement between the histone kinase activity of the two PKC-delta forms and their respective GAP-43 kinase activities (Fig. 1, A and B). In this respect, the difference in histone kinase activity may be a reflection of the intrinsic catalytic capacity of the two PKC-delta forms since histone is essentially a non-physiological substrate. Other determinants become relevant when a physiological substrate such as GAP-43 is used to assay kinase activity, as exemplified here by the non-catalytic interaction between the PKC-delta V0/C2 domain and GAP-43. Although the exact mechanism by which binding of GAP-43 to V0/C2 would contribute to specific activity is not formally demonstrated here, one possibility is that it affects the off-rate of phosphorylated product and hence the turnover of the phosphorylation reaction. Earlier work showing a low catalytic rate of phosphorylation of full-length GAP-43 versus GAP-43 phosphorylation site oligopeptide also implied rate-limiting interactions outside the direct site of catalysis (26), consistent with the above conclusion.

Binding of V0/C2 to GAP-43 is not prevented by binding of calmodulin to GAP-43. Therefore, calmodulin and V0/C2 have different binding sites on GAP-43. This binding site is not in the C-terminal part of the molecule since the binding characteristics of GAP-43-(1-146) are identical to those of full-length GAP-43. The binding site may therefore lie between the calmodulin-binding site (residues 43-51) and residue 146 or in the extreme N terminus of GAP-43.

Binding of GAP-43 to the regulatory domain of PKC-delta indicates that this domain is not just a target region for cofactor, but in fact serves as a protein-protein interaction domain. As such, this observation falls within the more general pattern of data suggesting such a role for the regulatory domain (39, 40). For instance, several phospholipid-binding proteins have been shown to interact with the regulatory domain of PKC in a phospholipid-dependent way. This binding occurs, at least in part, at the pseudosubstrate site, which itself has phospholipid binding capacity (39, 41). Although GAP-43 has been shown to bind phospholipid (9), phospholipids were not present in the binding studies here. The binding of GAP-43 to PKC-delta at the V0/C2 region is reminiscent of the binding of RACK1 to PKC-beta , which takes place at the C2 region (40, 42). However, in contrast to GAP-43, RACK1 is not a PKC substrate. Furthermore, PKC-delta does not need to be in an active conformation to bind to GAP-43. It was suggested that RACK1 binding to the C2 region is important for the subcellular redistribution of PKC-beta , but not of PKC-delta and -epsilon , upon phorbol ester stimulation of cells (42). Such specificity is intriguing in light of our observations, in that the interaction between PKC-delta and GAP-43 at the V0/C2 region may be important for the subcellular localization of PKC-delta . The finding that, on coexpression of GAP-43 and PKC-delta , a complex of the two proteins can be immunoprecipitated indicates that interaction can occur physiologically. The demonstration that this complex formation is dependent on the pretreatment of cells with the Ca2+ ionophore ionomycin indicates that the interaction is regulated by Ca2+ in a manner consistent with that determined in vitro for the binding of GAP-43 to the V0/C2 region in PKC-delta . C2-like regions are present not only in PKC, but also in a number of other proteins (33), and in these contexts appear to be involved in protein-protein interaction as well. The C2-like regions in synaptotagmin, for example, have been shown to bind syntaxin and AP-2 and also to dimerize (43-45). Many of these interactions are Ca2+-dependent, and structural analysis of the C2A region of synaptotagmin I has revealed a Ca2+-binding site involving four aspartate residues forming a "cup-like cavity" to accommodate a Ca2+ ion (46). Our results show that Ca2+-dependent interactions can take place at a C2-like region that does not contain these four aspartate residues, indicating that the basis of the Ca2+ responses of the C2 regions may be more complex than initially thought. This can be concluded also from the recent molecular cloning of a large number of synaptotagmin isotypes, which revealed that at least two of them, while containing the same four aspartate residues in their C2A region as synaptotagmin I, did not show Ca2+-dependent syntaxin binding (43).

The data presented demonstrate that PKC-delta interacts with GAP-43 in a manner controlled by two regulatory devices. First, the binding is Ca2+-dependent both in vitro and in vivo. Second, fractionation of PKC-delta reveals the presence of binding and non-binding forms. Since this heterogeneity is stable to fractionation, it is likely to be a consequence of PKC-delta post-translational modification. In vivo, the combined effects of these two regulatory devices will serve to determine whether or not PKC-delta and GAP-43 interact. Future efforts will need to address this interaction in situ to assess its physiological role.


FOOTNOTES

*   The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Dagger    To whom correspondence should be addressed: Protein Phosphorylation Lab., Imperial Cancer Research Fund, P. O. Box 123, 44 Lincoln's Inn Fields, London WC2A 3PX, UK. Tel.: 44-171-269-3274; Fax: 44-171-269-3094.
1   The abbreviations used are: PKC, protein kinase C; C1 and C2 regions, conserved regions 1 and 2, respectively; GST, glutathione S-transferase; hisGAP-43, histidine-tagged GAP-43; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Drs. Clive Dickson and Enrique Rozengurt for critical comments on this manuscript.


REFERENCES

  1. Stabel, S., and Parker, P. J. (1991) Pharmacol. & Ther. 51, 71-95 [Medline]
  2. Hug, H., and Sarre, T. F. (1993) Biochem. J. 291, 329-343 [Medline]
  3. Dekker, L. V., and Parker, P. J. (1994) Trends Biochem. Sci. 19, 73-77 [Medline]
  4. Nishizuka, Y. (1995) FASEB J. 9, 484-496 [Abstract]
  5. Kemp, B. E., Parker, M. W., Hu, S. H., Tiganis, T., and House, C. (1994) Trends Biochem. Sci. 19, 440-444 [Medline]
  6. Newton, A. C. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 28495-28498 [Full Text]
  7. Newton, A. C. (1995) Curr. Biol. 5, 973-976 [Medline]
  8. Benowitz, L. I., and Routtenberg, A. (1997) Trends Neurosci. 20, 84-91 [Medline]
  9. Coggins, P. J., and Zwiers, H. (1991) J. Neurochem. 56, 1095-1106 [Abstract]
  10. Liu, Y. C., and Storm, D. R. (1990) Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 11, 107-111 [Medline]
  11. Strittmatter, S. M., Vartanian, T., and Fishman, M. C. (1992) J. Neurobiol. 23, 507-520 [Medline]
  12. Van Lookeren Campagne, M., Dotti, C. G., Verkleij, A. J., Gispen, W. H., and Oestreicher, A. B. (1992) Neuroscience 51, 601-619 [Medline]
  13. Van Lookeren Campagne, M., Dotti, C. G., Jap Tjoen San, E. R., Verkleij, A. J., Gispen, W. H., and Oestreicher, A. B. (1992) Neuroscience 50, 35-52 [Medline]
  14. Dekker, L. V., De Graan, P. N. E., De Wit, M., Hens, J. J. H., and Gispen, W. H. (1990) J. Neurochem. 54, 1645-1652 [Abstract]
  15. Meiri, K. F., and Burdick, D. (1991) J. Neurosci. 11, 3155-3164 [Abstract]
  16. Gianotti, C., Nunzi, M. G., Gispen, W. H., and Corradetti, R. (1992) Neuron 8, 843-848 [Medline]
  17. Aigner, L., and Caroni, P. (1995) J. Cell Biol. 128, 647-660 [Abstract]
  18. Shea, T. B., and Benowitz, L. I. (1995) J. Neurosci. Res. 41, 347-354 [Medline]
  19. Dekker, L. V., De Graan, P. N. E., Oestreicher, A. B., Versteeg, D. H., and Gispen, W. H. (1989) Nature 342, 74-76 [Medline]
  20. Dekker, L. V., De Graan, P. N. E., Pijnappel, P., Oestreicher, A. B., and Gispen, W. H. (1991) J. Neurochem. 56, 1146-1153 [Abstract]
  21. Ivens, K. J., Neve, K. A., Feller, D. J., Fidel, S. A., and Neve, R. L. (1993) J. Neurochem. 60, 626-633 [Abstract]
  22. Hens, J. J., De Wit, M., Dekker, L. V., Boomsma, F., Oestreicher, A. B., Margolis, F., Gispen, W. H., and De Graan, P. N. E. (1993) J. Neurochem. 60, 1264-1273 [Abstract]
  23. Hens, J. J., De Wit, M., Boomsma, F., Mercken, M., Oestreicher, A. B., Gispen, W. H., and De Graan, P. N. E. (1995) J. Neurochem. 64, 1127-1136 [Abstract]
  24. Gamby, C., Waage, M. C., Allen, R. G., and Baizer, L. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 10023-10028 [Abstract/Full Text]
  25. Sheu, F., Marais, R., Parker, P., Bazan, N., and Routtenberg, A. (1990) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 171, 1236-1243 [Medline]
  26. Oehrlein, S., Parker, P., and Herget, T. (1996) Biochem. J. 317, 219-224 [Medline]
  27. Olivier, A., and Parker, P. (1991) Eur. J. Biochem. 200, 805-810 [Abstract]
  28. Ng, S. C., De La Monte, S. M., Conboy, G. L., Karns, L. R., and Fishman, M. C. (1988) Neuron 1, 133-139 [Medline]
  29. Maniatis, T., Sambrook, J., and Fritsch, E. F. (1989) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
  30. Dekker, L. V., McIntyre, P., and Parker, P. J. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 19498-19504 [Abstract]
  31. Towbin, H., Staehelin, T., and Gordon, J. (1979) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 76, 4350-4354 [Medline]
  32. Merril, C. R., Goldman, D., Sedman, S. A., and Ebert, M. H. (1981) Science 211, 1437-1438 [Medline]
  33. Ponting, C. P., and Parker, P. J. (1996) Protein Sci. 5, 162-166 [Medline]
  34. Cazaubon, S. M., and Parker, P. J. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 17559-17563 [Abstract]
  35. Olivier, A. R., and Parker, P. J. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 2758-2763 [Abstract]
  36. Li, W., Mischak, H., Yu, J.-C., Wang, L.-M., Mushinski, J. F., Heidaran, M. A., and Pierce, J. H. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 2349-2352 [Abstract]
  37. Soltoff, S. P., and Toker, A. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 13490-13495 [Abstract/Full Text]
  38. Szallasi, Z., Denning, M. F., Chang, E. Y., Rivera, J., Yuspa, S. H., Lehel, C., Olah, Z., Anderson, W. B., and Blumberg, P. M. (1995) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 214, 888-894 [Medline]
  39. Jaken, S. (1996) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 8, 168-173 [Medline]
  40. Mochly-Rosen, D. (1995) Science 268, 247-251 [Medline]
  41. Liao, L., Hyatt, S. L., Chapline, C., and Jaken, S. (1994) Biochemistry 33, 1229-1233 [Medline]
  42. Ron, D., Luo, J., and Mochly-Rosen, D. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 24180-24187 [Abstract/Full Text]
  43. Li, C., Ullrich, B., Zhang, J. Z., Anderson, R. G., Brose, N., and Sudhof, T. C. (1995) Nature 375, 594-599 [Medline]
  44. Brose, N., Hofmann, K., Hata, Y., and Sudhof, T. C. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 25273-25280 [Abstract/Full Text]
  45. Chapman, E. R., An, S., Edwardson, J. M., and Jahn, R. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 5844-5849 [Abstract/Full Text]
  46. Sutton, R. B., Davletov, B. A., Berghuis, A. M., Sudhof, T. C., and Sprang, S. R. (1995) Cell 80, 929-938 [Medline]

©1997 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

Abstract of this Article
Reprint (PDF) Version of this Article
Similar articles found in:
JBC Online
PubMed
PubMed Citation
This Article has been cited by:
Search Medline for articles by:
Dekker, L. V. || Parker, P. J.
Alert me when:
new articles cite this article
Download to Citation Manager

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS